Rice University engineers have devised a simpler and more efficient way to predict battery performance, which they claim is 100,000 times faster than current modeling techniques.
The analytical model developed by materials scientist Ming Tang and graduate student Fan Wang of Rice University’s Brown School of Engineering doesn’t require complex numerical simulation to guide the selection and design of battery components and how they interact.
The authors say their simplified model—freely accessible online—does the heavy lifting with an accuracy within 10% of more computationally intensive algorithms. Tang said it will allow researchers to quickly evaluate the rate capability of batteries. The results appear in the open-access journal Cell Reports Physical Science.
“There was a clear need for the updated model,” Tang said. “Almost everyone who designs and optimizes battery cells uses a well-established approach called P2D (pseudo-two dimensional) simulations, which are expensive to run. This especially becomes a problem if you want to optimize battery cells, because they have many variables and parameters that need to be carefully tuned to maximize the performance.”
“What motivated this work is our realization that we need a faster, more transparent tool to accelerate the design process and offer simple, clear insights that are not always easy to obtain from numerical simulations,” he added.
Battery optimization generally involves what the paper calls a “perpetual trade-off” between energy (the amount a battery can store) and power density (the rate at which the energy is released), all of which depend on the materials, their configurations and such internal structures as porosity.
“There are quite a few adjustable parameters associated with the structure that you need to optimize,” Tang said. “Typically, you need to make tens of thousands of calculations and sometimes more to search the parameter space and find the best combination. It’s not impossible, but it takes a really long time.”
He said the Rice model could be easily implemented in common software like MATLAB and Excel, and even on calculators.
To test the model, the researchers let it search for the optimal porosity and thickness of an electrode in common full- and half-cell batteries. In the process, they discovered that electrodes with “uniform reaction” behavior such as nickel-manganese-cobalt and nickel-cobalt-aluminum oxide are best for applications that require thick electrodes to increase the energy density.
They also found that battery half-cells (with only one electrode) have inherently better rate capability, meaning their performance is not a reliable indicator of how electrodes will perform in the full cells used in commercial batteries.
Source: Rice University